Nancy Pelosi Says She Won't Help Democrats Save Ginsburg's Seat

54 837
5.3%
Published on 21 Sep 2020, 19:00
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi might not have an actual say as to who gets to replace Ruth Bader Ginsburg, but she does have tools at her disposal that could help save the seat until after the election. This includes leveraging a looming government shutdown, but she has already made it clear that she refuses to do it. She says she "might" be open to impeaching Trump in order to stop them, but that's never going to happen. Ring of Fire's Farron Cousins explains what's happening.

Link - cnn.com/2020/09/20/politics/pe...

Become a member today!: youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibR...

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: patreon.com/TheRingofFire

Find our merchandise at Teespring: teespring.com/stores/rof-store

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: youtube.com/theringoffire

Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: twitter.com/RingofFireRadio
Google+: plus.google.com/11841583157319...
Instagram: instagram.com/ringoffirenetwor...

Follow more of our stories at TROFIRE.com

Subscribe to our podcast: ROFPodcast.com

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

So, uh, in the wake of the passing of Supreme court justice, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as I've mentioned, Democrats don't have a whole hell of a lot of options here. Um, they don't have the majority in the Senate, so therefore Mitch McConnell can kind of do whatever he wants and he can get Trump's nominee appointed. Now, Nancy Pelosi over in the house of representatives has even less power than the powerless Democrats in the Senate, or does she, she may not have a say and whether or not whoever Trump appoints actually gets confirmed. Cause she is not in the Senate. Therefore doesn't get to vote on it. She does have some tools at her disposal, but don't worry folks. Cause she assured us over the weekend that she is absolutely not going to use those tools. Why? Oh, cause that's just what she does. She approaches every situation from a position of caving.

Cause that's just what the democratic party does. They approach everything. Every time they have to go and compromise, they already pray compromise before they get to the part where they actually have to compromise thereby giving away far more than they ever possibly needed. What happened this weekend is that Nancy Pelosi said she would absolutely not use the threat of a government shutdown because for those who haven't been paying attention about two weeks ago, they reached a tentative deal. Her with Steve Minutian, uh, to avoid a government shutdown in the short run. But in the long run, we still have a budget battle. There seems to be no resolution in sight. Therefore we would be seeing a government shutdown. She can absolutely back out of the negotiation she made with Minutian and shut down the federal government. At the end of September, she could do that.

And she could say, we're not going to come up with any kind of temporary spending. We're not going to come up with any kind of longterm budget until, and unless you make sure that you do not under any circumstances, nominate a judge to replace Ginsburg until you know, well, if you win the election, sure you get to go ahead and do it. But if you lose, we don't do it at all. Now would Trump adhere to this? Probably not. But could Nancy actually be seen as a strong positive leader if she came out and did this? Absolutely. But she won't. This is the one tool. This is the one tool in her arsenal that she could use. And I feel like before anybody even suggested it, she came out and said, no, no, no, no, no, no, no. I'm not doing this. Don't worry. I'm not, absolutely not going to do this. And then she said something even worse. She said, she's open to the idea of re impeaching Trump because then the Senate, once they have articles of impeachment that have been passed by the house of representatives, they're not allowed to take up any other business until after those articles have been voted on by the

Senate.

Pretty interesting trick there. Right? It's a catch with that. You actually have to have a reason to impeach him. Like you have to have evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors otherwise now, I mean, technically sure you could draft an article of impeachment right now and saying, we don't like Trump. We want to impeach. And you have the majority in the house. You could absolutely impeach him for that. How's that going to look though?
newstechmusickids