Julian Assange Labeled Not A Journalist In UK Ruling To Deny US Extradition

13 857
Published on 10 Jan 2021, 19:00
Via America’s Lawyer: A U.K. court blocks the U.S. request to extradite Julian Assange, citing concerns for his mental health and physical well-being. Mike Papantonio & Farron Cousins discuss more.

Become a member today!: youtube.com/channel/UCYWIEbibR...

Support us by becoming a monthly patron on Patreon, and help keep progressive media alive!: patreon.com/TheRingofFire

Find our merchandise at Teespring: teespring.com/stores/rof-store

Spread the word! LIKE and SHARE this video or leave a comment to help direct attention to the stories that matter. And SUBSCRIBE to stay connected with Ring of Fire's video content!

Support Ring of Fire by subscribing to our YouTube channel: youtube.com/theringoffire

Be sociable! Follow us on:
Facebook: facebook.com/RingofFireRadio
Twitter: twitter.com/RingofFireRadio
Google+: plus.google.com/11841583157319...
Instagram: instagram.com/ringoffirenetwor...

Follow more of our stories at TROFIRE.com

Subscribe to our podcast: ROFPodcast.com

*This transcript was generated by a third-party transcription software company, so please excuse any typos.

A UK judge denied the United States' extradition request for WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, this week as a matter of fact, which is the best thing for Assange and for journalism. Look, you know, let me tell you the ugliest part of this story is the woman who, the, in Sweden says that Assange, that he raped her. They made a movie out of it, and then they find out it was all trumped up crap. Okay. But it was run by the government. Okay. That he was a hero. The, you know, the American public looked at him like, well, this guy, he told us things we didn't know. They were spying on us. They were carrying out executions in other countries where they shouldn't have been executing people, things like that, that kind of seem important. And he made it public. So they, they trumped up this, this deal on him. But what's your take on Assange overall?
I, I think it's ridiculous what's happening right now. I mean, it's great that they're not going to extradite him to the US but he's in, you know, wanted for journalism. And the courts keep trying to say, and even the British court that said you can't, we're not going to extradite him right now, they still said, but he's not a journalist. And so what, what do you, what are we going to do? Are we going to have a global international court case on what is a journalist?
Because he published these things. He didn't find them. But they were given to him and he published them for the world to see.
How is he, how is he not a journalist?
Do you think you could go to wall street journal and say, hey, wow, I just found out that the American public is being spied on in their homes without any kind of warrants. That they're, they're spying on us by way of our computers. They're spying on us by way of our telephones. I think people should know that and here we have some documents that we want to release. And so, I mean, you can't get, you're not going to get, you're not going to get corporate journalists to do anything like that because they have zero courage. If it doesn't bleed, they don't care. If it doesn't create hate, they don't care. Division, they don't care. It's not going to be something that sells. But this guy said, look, I, you, you can do with it what you want, but I'm going to release it.
Right. And part of the reason too that the judge won't extradite him, which again is a very good thing, is because the judge said, listen, if he goes to the US there is nothing to protect him from harming himself, you know, or from, you know, anything else happening to him. Which, you know, we, we know what that kind of strong implication is when the judge says it. But they understand overseas how, how messed up our judicial system is, how messed up our prison system is. And they understand what happens in our prison system to people like Julian Assange. So at least they had enough sense to say, we're not sending him to you, but to literally say in your ruling that this man is not a journalist and therefore is not protected by freedom of the press. That's ridiculous. And that's a lie.
Yeah. And they call it journalism the, over in the UK, maybe the some morning edition, which it looks like it's a tabloid, it's tabloid garbage. And here, this guy put information out that actually has an impact on our culture where we can say, yeah, this it's important that we know what the government is doing. What the spook industry is doing. That's fairly important. Chelsea Manning's information would have never been released would it?
No, absolutely not. There, there's no other group that would have done this. And part of the reason Julian Assange gets demonized here in the US too, is because he's gone after both sides.

#rof #trofire #theringoffire #progressivenews